IMGpapers

Newspapers of the International Marxist Group and its forerunners, 1968–1988

AR FRONT

Red Weekly No. 156, 25 June 1976 · p. 7 of the scan · 149 words

The scan: rw-no156-jun-25-1976.pdf (PDF, Marxists Internet Archive, opens at this page)

Uncorrected machine reading. This text was read by machine (Apple Vision OCR) from a scan of a newspaper page, and the page was cut into articles by machine, at the headlines found by their type size. Nothing has been corrected: expect misread words, text from a neighbouring article, and titles that are the machine reading of the headline, some of them only fragments. Quote from the scan, not from this page.
How this article was cut and titled: headline found by type size in the OCR geometry (split_tabloid.py); 1-2 of 4; machine-segmented newspaper page; uncorrected Vision OCR.

page 7 of the scan

national flag flanked by the hammer and sickle, so the French party mixed the symbol of the October revolution with the Tricolour, Why did the Stalinists led by Thorez and Ducios make such a sharp turn?

This question takes on a renewed importance today with the Italian elections (see separate article) and the development of the Union of the Left in France, which won 49 per cent of the vote in the 1974 presidential elections. Can revolutionary Marxists take the same attitude to the Union of the Left as the Trotskyists of the International Workers Party did to the Popular Front in the 1930s? Is the Union of the Left a popular front?

These are some of the questions discussed below in an assessment by PAM HURST and RIC SISSONS of the sig nificance of the French Popular Front. their capital, union policies". matic cost-of living increases.!

← THE POPUZIG AND ZAG →

Something wrong on this page?