IMGpapers

Newspapers of the International Marxist Group and its forerunners, 1968–1988

Lie

Red Weekly No. 165, 9 September 1976 · p. 6 of the scan · 164 words

The scan: rw-no165-sep-9-1976.pdf (PDF, Marxists Internet Archive, opens at this page)

Uncorrected machine reading. This text was read by machine (Apple Vision OCR) from a scan of a newspaper page, and the page was cut into articles by machine, at the headlines found by their type size. Nothing has been corrected: expect misread words, text from a neighbouring article, and titles that are the machine reading of the headline, some of them only fragments. Quote from the scan, not from this page.
How this article was cut and titled: headline found by type size in the OCR geometry (split_tabloid.py); 6-6 of 6; machine-segmented newspaper page; uncorrected Vision OCR.

page 6 of the scan

This was an outright lie. Certai members of the IMG supported banner and the right of those wished to carry it, but the wome contingent was by no means exclusiv made up of members or sympathisers the IMG. But for Deason this irrelevant, because his purpose was win the vote at the mass meeting agai the carrying of the banner.

This meeting itself had an imp ance, because at the preceding 'coun there had been a decision that such ite weren't up for discussion at meetings. The issue of the separ contingents was the one occasion w this prohibition was successfully fou And although the mass meeting vo against the contingents' rights, the that the matter was discussed at all albeit for only 15 minutes - wa victory for proletarian democracy But the decision itself was not, ause workers' democracy is not sim about majority rulings, it is about defence of the rights of such minori ise, make their own propaganda, an

← Oil on troubleFacade →

Something wrong on this page?