Criticism 'mostly fair'

Uncorrected machine reading. This text was read by machine (Apple Vision OCR) from a scan of a newspaper page, and the page was cut into articles by machine, at the headlines found by their type size. Nothing has been corrected: expect misread words, text from a neighbouring article, and titles that are the machine reading of the headline, some of them only fragments. Quote from the scan, not from this page.
How this article was cut and titled: headline found by type size in the OCR geometry (split_tabloid.py); 2-3 of 6; machine-segmented newspaper page; uncorrected Vision OCR.

page 2 of the scan

As member Socialists. | would like to answer the letter from Eunice Sharples [IS] in Red Weekly, 23 September. Any organisation should be prepared to listen to crucism and I think that most of Red Weekly's coverage on the Right to Work march was fair.

I didn't agree with the rule for no banners, particularly for women's chaner Camparen women not having the right to march which you [Eunice separately oles take as an Insul be double right. We should have the right to be free to work.

Haven't you noticed that women are being made redundant first? What happened to the Child Benefit Scheme Government threw out? Why allowed the "privilege' to many kids we want, if we want any? How many women are too damn dog tired to have time to position, let alone politics?

You asked 'have we got leprosy' and Parliament, us as women to teel interor.

crisis. We, people always go first.

Far from banner, it would have shown a we have number oT womel banners cecice now think about neit banners. No to sectananism with one avnontion Our arter to lonn

----- pull-quotes -----

International We have the right to a better life.

leading to action. aren't we

the working class'. racism we must fight

time! - CHRIS PARKER (Watford). With the publication of these letters, our correspondence on the Right to